Sunday , 17 December 2017

Kristen Bell: Get vaccinated if you want to hold my kids

Actress Kristen Bell is making it clear she has little room for vaccine doubters in her life.

As the measles outbreak puts the spotlight on parents who refuse to vaccinate their children, the “Frozen” star wants fans to know she has no such hesitations.

“It’s a very simple logic: I believe in trusting doctors, not know-it-alls,” she told The Hollywood Reporter.

Dax Shepard and Kristen Bell attend the 2015 People’s Choice Awards in Los Angeles on January 7.

Bell and her husband Dax Shepard have two daughters: Lincoln, born in 2013, and Delta, who arrived in December. The couple insists that visitors who want to see the girls must first get a shot.

“When Lincoln was born, the whooping cough epidemic was growing, and before she was 2 months old, we simply said [to friends], ‘You have to get a whooping cough vaccination if you are going to hold our baby,'” Bell told the newspaper.

Bell said she’s taking the same approach with baby Delta. The actress has been tweeting about the importance of vaccines since the measles outbreak began.

Bell lives in California where critics say the state’s personal philosophy exemption makes it too easy for parents to skip vaccines. Almost 23 percent of kids were under-vaccinated in a community near San Francisco, according to a study published in the journal Pediatrics.

There were 10,831 cases of whooping cough in California in 2014, according to the California Department of Public Health, and four infants died from whooping cough in California last year. Across the country, in 2012 there were 48,277 cases of whooping cough reported in 2012, the most reported cases since 1955, according to the CDC.



  1. Well only a person who does not believe and rely on God would say and demand something stupid as she did. And luckily so I have no need nor wish to hold her kids 🤷🏼‍♀️🤷🏼‍♀️

  2. I may really sorry but Kristen’s comment about peanut butter and vaccines is seriously uneducated and not even an appropriate analogy! Injecting a child with a biologic drug is completely different than exposing another child to an allergen.

    What about those retroviruses that can’t be killed in the live vaccines bc they’d also be killing the virus they WANT to inject? What about those insertional DNA strands that the FDA is concerned about in the vaccines grown in aborted fetal tissue – cells which have overlived their senescence and are now tumorigenic and causing childhood cancers?

    No thank you Ms. Bell. You do your thing but don’t force s medical procedure on others – for which the manufacturer and the medical professional have no liability.

    Keep propping up the top of the top of the 1% with the pharmaceutical industry – but don’t ever pretend to “occupy” a dsmned thing.

  3. Vaccines cause encephalitis (brain inflammation), it says so on every vaccine insert. The symptoms of brain inflammation are the same behaviours of autism. You can also read the rulings from the federal government’s vaccine court, where they have paid out almost 4B for vaccine injuries and deaths. Plus, the Supreme Court labeled vaccines unavoidably unsafe. And last but not least my son had seizures after the DTaP.

  4. Such a position is understandable when all the facts are neither discussed nor easily accessible and hwere sensible discussion and serious examination of safety issues are ignored.

    Vaccines help eradicate many diseases throughout the world.

    The production of vaccines involves growing a virus in living cells. Historically they have been manufactured by using animal cell lines that contain the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) of that animal. Within the final product some residual living DNA remains as a contaminant in the vaccine as it cannot all be filtered out. In 1979 changes were introduced to vaccine manufacturing previously made in animal cell lines to manufacturing in human fetal cell lines. Therefore with each dose of the vaccines newly manufactured on human cells we are injecting children and adults with residual human fetal DNA and in some cases a retrovirus.

    It is a well understood scientific fact that lose, living human DNA in a human can insert into the genome of that human. As the DNA in the genes govern the function of cells, such DNA insertions can seriously disrupt the function of the invaded cell. If this lose DNA invades the genes governing the function of a nerve cell in the brain, such disruption can have devastating consequences. Therefore, SCPI researches the potential health risks of the residual human DNA found in the products we use.

    Many scientists have now hypothesized that cancer and other childhood neurological diseases such as autistic disorder are caused by mutations in the child’s DNA. This conclusion is based upon finding numerous mutations in the brains and/or blood of such children which cannot be found in their parents, these are called de novo mutations. They are caused by something that happens to the child after birth. SCPI researches have extensively reviewed the potential health risks posed by this residual human DNA. Based upon that research, SCPI does ongoing research and seeks to raise awareness of the potential health risks of manufacturing medical products on human cell lines. [Ref]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thanks for visiting! If you want to see more content like this in your news-feed, don’t forget to give our page a like on Facebook.

Powered by WordPress Popup